I recently viewed a TVO
Agenda segment on Rural Ontario which among
other things discussed “What is rural Ontario”, something which I
and many others have tried
to define unsuccessfully. The guests included
freelance writer, farmer and former editor of our local paper Jim
Merriam whose articles about rural issues I always enjoy when I
occasionally see a Sun Times paper with his column in it. Also
present was Rob Hannam, Chair of the Rural Ontario Institute and two
other guests. As always with Steve Pakin hosting an interesting
discussion ensued which I will not try and outline here except to say
that despite being unable to define 'rural' there was consensus on a
couple of issues several of which I have written about on these pages
time and time again.
Those being Infrastructure, Internet
and Communications and the benefits that rural communities bring to
our urban counterparts, not the least of which is the agricultural
input to our food basket. One guest pointed out that rural is as much
a state of mind as a place, it is as perhaps indicated in the term
used to describe what farmers do “cultural”, this I feel is very
much a good description and perhaps why we out here in the country
have such difficulty getting our point of view across to urban
residents and politicians and why we likewise have difficulty with
understanding the city folks point of view. There is a considerable
cultural difference.
As the guests all agreed the answer is
in communications,
communications,
communications
– but how we as rural communities enable that dialogue is the
difficulty, once again our guests agreed .... they had no suggestions
as to how to improve the conversation between the two solitudes. As
regular readers will know I have previously suggested that for rural
areas where considerable travel is often necessary for face to face
gathering to discuss such issues the internet could be a great tool,
unfortunately it seems that rural folks have yet to realize the power
of this tool. Whether that is due to no having a suitable forum in
which to participate, the general feeling of 'I cannot make a
difference' that currently infects our society,a lack of a decent
internet connection in many rural areas or some other roadblock is
hard to tell. I did note that Jim at least did have a high speed
connection that enabled him to participate by skype, I can but dream
of such and whether it would even be affordable or have very limited
volume limits if it was available is also debatable, I cannot even
review the ½ hr TVO program without hogging much of my monthly
allocation and even then not as a streaming video due to speed
limitations.
As Steve pointed out there is a
perception out there that say rural folks are such a small (and ever
declining) percentage of our population that the political machine
and the urban majority may not need to bother with those 'whining
farmers and country bumpkins”. It is difficult for those whom I
have previously identified as “The
Forgotten Minority” to counter these
perceptions when that old country adage “the squeaky wheel gets the
grease” is so true and there are so many wheels falling off across
Ontario. That the panel were all optimistic as the the future of our
rural and farm communities was good to hear, I just wish I could
agree with them.
Before I wind up this post I must give
the Rural Ontario Institute a bit of a plug for their efforts to
provide links to rural and agricultural information on their web
site. They have so many links that it is almost overwhelming but the
Rural
Ontario Reader and their
links page will give a good starting point for
those researching or seeking more information on rural issues. I
just wish that the efforts to create an interactive forum for rural
issues started by the FWIO and supported by the ROI or something
similar was a better and more widely used method of allowing rebuttal
and dialogue on rural issues.
Thanks for
this panel discussion Steve and TVO, lets see
some more programs on rural issues in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment