Originally posted over at Democracy
Under Fire it is reproduced here for my handful of rural readers.
With the Ontario election now history and a slight uptick in the
voter turn out I will relate a few of the problems various voters
have encountered whilst trying to vote in an effort to make both the
voters and those that run the system aware of impediments to voting
during said election. Most of these stories are specific to rural
areas and related to poll location and rural addressing issues, it
may be that in urban areas such things are not such a problem and it
would seem that Elections Ontario either is unaware of such problems
or considers rural voters as less important than their urban
counterparts. Non of the stories are new to the 2014 election but
have been ongoing throughout the last several Ontario elections, some
are relevant to the federal electoral system also.
Let us first look at a couple of lads who were first time voters
and who lived across the road from each other one of whom had found
out where to vote and took his buddy along to also vote. Trouble was
that his buddy was to vote at a different poll, not one across the
room or even a couple of blocks away but 8 or 10 miles away. These
lads had already travelled 10 or 12 miles from their home to get to
the poll and unfortunately it being 8.45pm had no chance of getting
to the other poll location before closing. Not a good first time
voting experience!
At the same poll a number of seniors some using walkers came to
the poll location situated just a few houses away only to be told
that they could not vote as their poll was in a village some 10 to 12
miles away. To add insult to injury the entire village where they
lived was directed to the distant location despite there being more
than enough room to accommodate more polls at their local hall. This
issue is common to many rural polls and has been well
documented in my personal blog during the
previous election.
At an advanced poll a fellow came in to vote and pulled out his
recently renewed drivers licence for identification only to find that
the address did not match, his drivers licence still showed lot and
concession instead of the now required road and fire number (rural
equivalent of street number). Seems that the word has not reached
licence renewal folk that lot and con is no longer a valid address!
At the same advanced poll a fellow came in to register and vote as
no voter card was received, not a problem except that he had not
moved in the last 10 years and had corrected his information before
the last two elections and his information on the voters list was
STILL not corrected on the list. Third time lucky perhaps?
A number of voters either declined their votes or deliberately
spoiled their ballots. How do we know this? To decline a ballot the
voter must hand the ballot back to the clerk and tell them they wish
to decline, anyone nearby can hear and see this transaction. By the
same token at locations where a tabulating machine is used (as in
most advanced ballots) the machine will reject an incorrectly filled
out ballot, the voter must then tell the clerk that they want the
vote processed as filled out. There is no 'Declined / None of the
above' box on the ballots!
These are just a few of the 'difficulties' that I have been made
aware of most of which in my view are not that hard to fix or at
least make less of a problem. The addressing problems can only be
corrected by keeping an up to date database which requires those
moving to somehow get that data input into the system, how is that we
must update our drivers licence immediately after moving but this
does not filter down to voting lists and that rural addressing
conventions are still not being observed despite Canada Post recently
declaring that they will soon stop delivering rural mail unless it
has the road and fire number on it.
Finally how is it that at advanced polls anyone from within that
riding can vote at any poll but on voting day you MUST vote at a
specific poll location? The major impediment here is that the voter
lists are still being distributed to the polls in printed form and to
wade through some 80,000 names on hundreds of loose leaf pages is a
major chore, just ask an advanced poll clerk about that. At the very
least the riding list should be on computer as a read only file with
a search utility (the feds have done this at advanced polls) but
should not updates and the fact that the citizen has voted not be
instantly updated via computer? As it stands it takes 24 hours or
more for the written changes to go to the district office, be entered
and new printed lists to be produced and sent out to the advanced
polls. If someone wanted to vote multiple times it would be
relativity easy and whilst it would probably be picked up eventually
and (presumably) the perpetrator taken to task, the votes themselves
could not be cancelled as no vote is coupled with any particular
voter.
Whilst so many of us are calling for election reform in the way in
which our votes determine the composition of the legislatures, the
way in which we actually cast our vote is at least as important if we
wish more citizens to make their wishes known. Its a difficult thing
to ensure that any system is not subject to manipulation by those who
would 'cheat' but we must try and make it less of a chore and
eliminate as many problems as possible so that ALL citizens can and
will vote. In my opinion whilst paper ballots must still be an option
the use of technology can only help with this despite the perhaps
increased possibility of voter fraud and the difficulty of conducting
a 'recount' in such situations.
I note that information as to where to vote and identification
required was available on line or by telephone but for many folks who
do not use the internet or were unaware that they had a problem until
they went to vote it was too little too late. I wonder how many folks
actually read the bulk mailing that went out right after the election
was called and how many thought to take action when they did not
receive a voter card. The above difficulties are not ALL the systems
fault!
Let us know about your Rural Election Stories!
A longtime rural resident, I use my 60 plus years of life learning to opinionate here and elsewhere on the “interweb” on everything from politics to environmental issues. A believer in reasonable discourse rather than unhelpful attacks I try to give positive input to the blogesphere, so feel free to comment upon rural issues or anything else posted here. But don’t be surprised if you comments get zapped if you are not polite in your replys.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment