All that said here are the numbers from the Internet Speed Test at around noon Monday 4th August.
Below are a ping test and route trace to the Rogers site which seems to indicate that the problem is entirely within their network which is probably unable to deal with the weekend volume. That is not a valid excuse for these kind of numbers in my view
Click images to enlarge
And yes, I can here you city types snickering, internet connections are not the strong point for rural living, if you are lucky you can perhaps hook up to a wireless provider that does not rip you off with high prices and low speed and volume limits but many of us have two choices – Cell hookup via a hub or even more pricey satellite hookup also with speed and volume limits. When I see those ad's on TV talking of streaming video or re-watching a good documentary I can but say “I wish”, there is little doubt that internet is available to most Canadians and the network is expanding to more remote areas, but AFORDABLE high speed internet without crippling limits is another matter.
Meanwhile I'm stuck with Rogers, but at least now I can tell the 'customer service' guy to go to my blog and see the evidence of their crappy system!
UPDATE
Its now two weeks since my original complaint to Rogers and needless to say that 'escalated' thing did NOTHING, no call back from 'engineering' as requested and once again this weekend we have connection speeds of less than 200k and ping values of up to 3,000 ms at times. The satellite alternative is looking better all the time!
5 comments:
Save yourself the continuing headaches. Call
x-plornet and have them set you up with a Satellite connection. I did because of exactly how you are feeling and the lousy service, and speeds the big 3 provide. I live on a remote island off the west coast of B.C. with no electricity other than solar power and a generator for back-up.
I get about 20 gigs per month for 60-65 bucks. I believe this package blows Rogers out of the water. I haven't measured the speed because I have no need to. It may not be city speeds but it is plenty fast enough. Streaming video works pretty good, not perfect, but way above acceptable. We run an Apple wifi modem and have 5-6 devices running all the time (an iPad, 2 phones and 2 laptops running all the time.
Thanks for that Anon, that is my only other option and is under consideration. Their site says 100G at 5mb for abut $60 but I believe satellite is extra and price goes up after 6 months. Gota check the fine print with all of these guys!
Hahahaha, that first line should have read:
"Give yourself more headaches. Call
x-plornet"
I should also have said - I had the same issues with the rogers hub and I got a Bell one instead. Bell may not be perfect but they were better than Rogers for me. Plus, they've pretty much now matched the Rogers plan, 20GB - $90. Its getting better but at my previous property I'd use over 200GB a month :-(
Love the rural life, just an hour north of TO.
Its a case of out of the frying pan into the fire, Anon. They ALL use 'traffic management' which means that as the network get busy they cut back on speed and access and give priority to some services over others, in the case of a hub which is on cell that means that phone services take precedence over hub services. I note that satellite internet (xplorenet and others) have the same clause in their fine print.
The joys of rural life eh!
Post a Comment