As some urban dwellers
in Ontario rail against a gas fired generating station intended to
provide power for their area continuing to be built in their
neighborhood despite election promises to move it, the war between
rural communities and wind farm advocates also continues. The
difference is that a gas fired plant provides power 100% of the time
and a wind turbine perhaps 30% of the time, the gas plant provides
power within the community in which it is built whilst the wind farms
covering large areas of rural land are intended to serve primarily
the needs of distant urban communities, the urban area has sufficient
population to provide objectors with enough 'clout' to make
politicians at least listen whilst the rural populations are but a
whisper in the wind!
Much of the problem
that has arisen is purely due to the “Green Energy Act”
which removes any meaningful control of the location, size or even
very existence of wind farm projects from both the local population
and their local councilors, it overrides any land planning,
environmental or atheistic considerations that would normally be part
of the planning process. It is not that wind power is all bad, just
that (as I have said before) its ability to provide relief from using
other forms of hydro generation is severely limited until and unless
high
capacity storage solutions are part of such
projects. That such an intermittent source of power should find
strong support from large corporations is not a surprise given the
governments guarantee price (for 20 -25 years) of the electricity
that is generated at what is currently many time the going rate for
hydro.
Given that “Another 2,000 turbines have been
approved.” I don’t thing there is going to be too much “
peace with rural Ontario” any time soon! Do the math, at a
typical 500m spacing that is another 1,000sq km of rural Ontario
covered with these things, and proponents of the projects wonder why
rural dwellers oppose such developments. We wonder what would be the
reaction were every park in Toronto had a wind turbine erected in it
.........!
Since it seems that the
fish and urban folks have more clout than either the birds or rural
folks and have stopped the proposals for offshore wind farms its
seems to me that other forms generation such as tidal /
wave
action projects should be considered. The
latter may well be suited for the great lakes given that being
relativity shallow they develop a great deal of wave action with
little excuse. Ice may create some limitations in fresh water
locations but I suspect that it would be at least as viable as wind.
The long term answer would, at least given Icelands experience with
it, seem
to
be geothermal however as of yet I have seen
little appetite in Canada to develop such high capital cost ventures.
It remains to be seen whether the change from a majority to a
minority government will mean any changes to Ontarios GEA that will
encourage other innovative and perhaps less intrusive way of
supplying our power hungry society.
It is not that any of
these types of energy supply should not be part of our system but
that consideration must be given to both the impact upon the
environment AND those living near such installations.
And thats the way it
looks from my neck of these rural woods!